Wednesday, October 19, 2016

The ‘loyal opposition”


When I was a child, Republican Dwight Eisenhower was president and Congress had Democratic majorities. Democrats called themselves “the loyal opposition” and while there were ideological differences, the country’s business continued.

Kennedy and then Johnson then became presidents, and while both elections against Nixon and Goldwater were rather hostile, the nation healed and continued the country’s business.

Nixon was a great president, and had a lot of support until he was forced to resign and his appointed vice president, Gerald Ford, took over the reins. And somehow, despite having a president who was not elected on a national ticket, the nation continued its business. And this kept going on: through Carter, Regan, and others. But along the course of America’s story, something happened. People began to hate.

I suppose it got out of hand when Bill Clinton was impeached. There was much rancor. It seemed as if some Republicans wanted to get back for the abuses of Nixon. Yes, Clinton was a sexual predator in many respects (though I think it was all between consenting adults), but to impeach him because he lied about getting a BJ from an intern doesn’t exactly strike me as treasonous.

But there was rage when Bill beat the rap. And it was at the Clintons – both of them.

We went through the Bush presidencies, and exercised our rights to not give George H.W. a second term. But the gloves really came off with George W.  Frankly, I don’t blame people. George W. was simply incompetent. Clinton left him a massive surplus and he insisted on returning it to the people. That’s OK, but to do so, he actually borrowed money – from China, no less. He led us into a war with Iraq without any proof they were behind 9-11 and somehow managed to deregulate us into the second-worst economic crisis in our history.

And along came Obama – a (gasp!) Black man with a vision for change. And he did make a change in our health care system. And the country’s rage, fueled by billions from our insurance premium dollars,  again emerged. And so did the Tea Party.

I watched with concern the emergence of this movement.  It was packed with birthers, birchers, militias, and white supremacists. But unknown to most of us, it was backed by huge donations from people like the Koch brothers.

Suddenly, long time conservative Republicans were ousted by Tea Party candidates in primaries and these new candidates had a “never compromise” attitude. Politics is sometimes called “the art of compromise.” It needs to happen for the nation’s business to continue. But for the last six years we have been in a stalemate. While most notably, Obama’s Supreme Court nominee has been blocked for strictly political reasons, there have been hundreds of appointments to lower federal courts also blocked. This leaves us in a judicial morass. Court calendars have been clogged beyond manageability. It is one small example of failure to get Constitutional guarantees such as the right to a speedy trial. Civil cases can go on unresolved for years. Insurance companies can refuse to pay for life saving treatment that is apparently covered, and keep the interest for years on amounts that will eventually be awarded to plaintiffs.

And that’s just one example. We need to fix our highways. Interstate 80 in Pennsylvania is an example. Lanes are constantly blocked for temporary repairs throughout the state. We need to deal with the horrible results of our war on terror. There is no congressional approval for the President’s efforts recommended by our military. How many times has President Obama been forced to use executive orders when Congress refuses to act? We need to stop the stealing of digital information, yet Wickileaks seems to be backing the GOP by leaking Democrat e-mail. I ask you, how different is this action from Watergate?

Now of course, the supporters of Donald Trump are not going to accept simple things like facts. These people are blindly following a path that won’t listen to facts. But you know what? There were others who supported very liberal candidates like McGovern or McCarthy. They even had a name – the counterculture – that consisted of a whole lot of hippies and others.


And the nation recovered from these people. But Trump has said something that is untrue. The election is rigged. It isn’t and Trump knows it. At this point, Trump is going to lose. And it is obvious he is not going to be a gracious loser. He is simply going to be a loser. 

Throughout history, losing candidates have given concession speeches urging people to support the winner of the election. For the good of the nation, Trump has to deliver a helluva concession, including saying Hillary won "fair and square." and deny that the election was rigged. He must graciously point out that the people have spoken before thanking those who supported him. Can he do it? I just don't see it happening, and it could tear apart the nation.

His followers, mainly those of the “no compromise,” Tea Party mentality, will not accept that the majority of Americans oppose what Trump stands for. And I ask myself, are we seeing the maturation of the “disloyal opposition?” I hear many quote Jefferson: “The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.” Will the followers of Trump, who consider themselves patriots, become the tyrants? 

I am grateful that I am approaching 70 years of age and might not live through the upcoming chaos. But I can inevitably see that my children’s eyes might witness a chaos that will make them look back to the simpler times of their childhood, when Americas was a democracy.