Saturday, November 17, 2012

Election Thoughts


My following the election this year was vastly different than in previous years. I am in a place with no television, no internet and low cell phone signals. I spent time sitting in my car listening to sattelite radio. On the other hand, since I’m on the Pacific Coast, the election was called just after 8 p.m. my time. I’m used to being up well past midnight listening to returns.

So what were the results? Let’s see, after billions of dollars were spent, the people have spoken. And there is little difference. The President is still the President. Republicans still control the House and Democrats still control the Senate.

Did it make much of a difference? I think there was a very fundamental change.

First, let’s look at the Candidates, an African American and a Mormon. With the exception of JFK, a Catholic, America has always nominated WASPs. It says something about the direction of this country. I am told by CNN that 59 percent of whites voted for Romney and that the Hispanic vote made the difference. It means that there is an incredible change in America’s demographics.

And I can’t help but wonder how much of the white vote was based on prejudice rather than politics? But as far as the Presidential candidates were concerned, there were no real losers. America chose a more liberal philosophy. But from where I sit, the real losers were the extremists. Several key Tea Party members of the House lost their seats. And so there is hope. Eisenhower and Regan worked with a Democratic House and Senate. Clinton worked with a Republican Congress. And things got done. But two years ago, the nation was seized by haters – the Birthers, the Birchers, the militias, the intolerant Bible thumpers. And those supported by the Tea Party were unwilling to work with members of their own party, not to mention the President.

We once called the party out of power “the loyal opposition” and there is hope that the right wing’s “take no prisioners” stance of the past two years may be changing to one of a willingness to work together. Though the President won, the issues raised during the campaign were very valid.

The focus must be putting people to work in meaningful jobs. It’s not just unemployment. It’s also underemployment. When college graduates are filling jobs at employers of last resort such as Wal-Mart, and McDonald’s, it means that houses will continue to be lost and the poor will become poorer. Americans responded to the concept of supporting growth industries, such as energy. But more needs to be done. We need to seize back our industry. We need to find a way to get electronics manufacturing out of Asia. We need to realize that borrowing from the Chinese and then buying cheap Chinese goods are destroying our economy.

And thus, we also have to reel in spending. But it can’t be the immediate stoppage that the Republicans advocated. It took more than a decade and the entry into a world war to put an end to the depression. I think Americans realize that it will take more than four years to recover from the current recession. I hope that with the end of the Afgan War, the drain on our resources can be re-channeled.

But there is no doubt in my mind that the greatest evil out there must be stopped. You might call it “corporate America” but I choose to call it the insurance industry. CNN noted that the Republicans had more than $90 million more to spend than the Democrats. This was mainly through business. The average contribution for the Democratic party was $50, the exact amount I donated.

It would not surprise me if much of that difference came from the insurance industry. They spent hundreds of millions of my medical insurance premiums in fighting Obamacare. And, of course, for the candidate who vowed to end it despite having done the same thing as governor of Massachusetts.

How do we do it? We stop giving lip service to election reform and actually do it. It is a simple idea. If a business receives federal dollars, it must be limited to a certain dollar amount of political spending. What sense does it make for the insurance industry, which gets not only my premiums, but also billions, perhaps trillions, in support through Medicare and Medicaid, to take that money to try to influence elections instead of going about the business of taking care of people?

I also hope that Americans write their Congressional representatives and tell them that it is time to stop pandering to special interests and do what they were elected to do. Take care of we, the people.